← Search

Pam Landis

— year-end
105 matches · 68W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Pam Landis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Landis/Reddmann/LR/PVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-28 · Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Rojas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6
L
2026-07-26 · Anderson/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Anderson/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Meredith Reddmann / Courtney Jones
2026-07-12 · Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Rojas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Landis/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Landis/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · Anderson/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lanny Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-25 · Anderson/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald New mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · Reddmann/LR/PVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Thessing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · Cisne/Landis/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzy Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · Cisne/Landis/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Cisne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
75.9%
44W–14L · 59.9% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 42.1% of games
7.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.5% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova