← Search

Daniel Lazenby

Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 33W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Daniel Lazenby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Tharp/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitsy Tharp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Tharp/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Lukacs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · Bobbitt/LR/LRAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Turriff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · Junior/Adame/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Lazenby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Junior/Adame/LR/OC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Lazenby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · Junior/Adame/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Lazenby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Bobbitt/LR/LRAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth Owens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · Junior/Adame/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Cissell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Carr/Rogers/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julien Mirivel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-04 · Oyos/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Gilliam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
Chuck Seel / Carnell Rogers
2026-04-19 · Carr/Rogers/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julien Mirivel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · Oyos/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 62.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.5% of games
4.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer