← Search

Kimberly Beebe

West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 82W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Beebe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Concord Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Concord Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · Concord Crushers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Anne Brooking / Jennifer Brown
2026-01-16 · Rogue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Beauchamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-19 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-13 · Rogue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-06 · Rogue · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Geibel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-5
L
2025-05-30 · Rogue · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Megill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-09 · Rogue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
67.1%
53W–26L · 55.1% of games
3.5
24.7%
19W–58L · 40.1% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal