← Search

Rachel Pavis

Exton, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 118W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Pavis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
So Young Jang / Jane Kim
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Holinsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-07 · #4 Doubles · with Katie Rementer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becca Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Ratcliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-06-12 · Over Served · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-05 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ratcliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Ratcliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
W
2026-04-24 · Over Served · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Rementer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
So Young Jang / Jane Kim
2026-04-21 · Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-26 · TA Smash and Dash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
81%
17W–4L · 63.2% of games
3.0
53.4%
70W–61L · 50.2% of games
3.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
47 matches
#1 Singles
10%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal