← Search

Kyle Ehlers

— year-end
80 matches · 50W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kyle Ehlers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Ehlers - SHL · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ella Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Escambia/Sitton/Trilevel4.5/4.0/3.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · Ehlers - SHL · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kinsey Fields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Ehlers - SHL · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kinsey Fields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · Ehlers - SHL · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abigail Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Escambia/Ehlers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kody Ehlers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Escambia/Ehlers · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · Escambia/Ehlers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edan Benitez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · Escambia/Ehlers · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · Escambia/Ehlers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Baes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · Escambia/Ehlers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hayden Essary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-06 · Escambia/Ehlers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
90%
9W–1L · 69.2% of games
4.5
60%
12W–8L · 54.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 70.8% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer