← Search

Will Spencer

— year-end
178 matches · 122W–56L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Will Spencer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
W
2026-09-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brooklyn Meadows mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
Olivier Walon / Ignacio Avila
2026-08-17 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Fabbro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Carlos Diaz / Roberto Gentile
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Samuel Wallace championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Tucker Massey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Fabbro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with James Craft championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Robinson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Fortier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Robinson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Fortier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · Robinson - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Fortier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Robinson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Fortier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Escambia/Spencer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tucker Massey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
36W–9L · 62.3% of games
4.0
65.9%
29W–15L · 58.1% of games
4.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 42% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 60% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.1% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova