← Search

Grant Baesman

Centennial, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 96W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Grant Baesman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Lownsberry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Jeremy Thomas / Kendrick McLish
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Lownsberry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Lownsberry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Mark Hartman / Jameel Chohan
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Lownsberry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · KNO BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Baesman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Sreekanth P K / Ryan Lum
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Simon Payne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Baesman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Baesman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Baesman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · KNO BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Haverly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Lownsberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Alexander Linville / Chad Smith
2026-07-08 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Lownsberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
62.5%
40W–24L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
22W–20L · 53.6% of games
7.5mixed
70%
14W–6L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova