← Search

Dane Elliott

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 95W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dane Elliott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-08-18 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ragav Beemarao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-11 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · HG GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Elliott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Hynek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Hynek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · HG GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rene Meale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yurii Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Sean Allen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Hynek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Hynek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · HG RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Greco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-14 · LTFC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Fitzgerrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
68.8%
44W–20L · 60.4% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.8% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 64.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 58.3% of games
7.5mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe