← Search

Amy Lathrop

Carmel, IN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 9W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Lathrop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Machemer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marissa Sindelar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Machemer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Knepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Machemer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W CRC Machemer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Knepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Knepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Knepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Myra Endris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Susan Nixon / Anna Koval
2024-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannette Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Stacy Davis / Holly Coleman
2024-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Meister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2023-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova