Mary Peers
69 matches · 50W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Mary Peers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history69 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 71.6% of games
3.5
88.5%
23W–3L · 68.4% of games
4.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 45.2% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.