← Search

Meg Staebell

Denver, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 73W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meg Staebell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-09-01 · BP ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · BP ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Ajyra JONES / Anne Taylor
2026-07-28 · BP ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · BP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Travis Staebell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-30 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janet McNutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · BP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Travis Staebell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-02 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · BP RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · BP NAVY · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Travis Staebell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-19 · BP RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
60.3%
35W–23L · 54.4% of games
4.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.5% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.3% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova