← Search

Travis Staebell

Denver, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 78W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Travis Staebell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-09-03 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandon Jacquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-27 · NJ RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Burger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Burger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meng Lian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-02 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meng Lian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · BP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Meg Staebell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Overdyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Overdyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · BP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Meg Staebell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas DelaFuente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Overdyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
84.3%
43W–8L · 63.4% of games
4.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 56.2% of games
8.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams