← Search

Melissa Hayes-Gehrke

— year-end
99 matches · 31W–68L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Melissa Hayes-Gehrke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Hazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-10 · Randle - RUTHLESS Racket Mixed 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Henry Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meglyn Lansing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · Randle - RUTHLESS Racket Mixed 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Earnest White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · Randle - RUTHLESS Racket Mixed 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Milad Ebrahimi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Garcia-Tunon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-11 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meglyn Lansing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5
L
2026-02-27 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meglyn Lansing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-05 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lise Becker Vezina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-17 · Hayes-Gehrke - Cosmic Strings 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Pohoryles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Cybelle Long / Denise Plude
2025-10-30 · Dentoni - Wildcats · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tamar Henkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
18.4%
9W–40L · 38.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 29.8% of games
6.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.1% of games
7.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert