← Search

Tamar Henkin

Chevy Chase, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 116W–147L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tamar Henkin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Henkin - Serve & Folly · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-26 · Ahmed - Racket Reines · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Tennyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Battista - Net Setters 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Franks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-13 · Ahmed - Racket Reines · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pasimani Fryauff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Battista - Net Setters 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Ahmed - Racket Reines · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Casey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · Not Racket Science Boosters · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-04 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Leslie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Not Racket Science Boosters · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-05-21 · EN FUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Angelica Camp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · Not Racket Science Boosters · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Not Racket Science Boosters · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
18W–6L · 57.3% of games
3.5
32.7%
50W–103L · 43.9% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 56.7% of games
7.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.8% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
57 matches
#2 Singles
14%
37 matches
#1 Singles
11%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
21 matches
#3 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer