← Search

Nancy Siegel

— year-end
172 matches · 108W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
W
2026-08-16 · CSRC BARKER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diego Medina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Michael Green / Heather Green
2026-08-16 · CSRC BARKER · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Buerschen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · CSRC BARKER · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeremy G Fagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · CSRC BARKER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Aronson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · CSRC BARKER · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeremy G Fagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Park championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Park championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-19 · CSRC BARKER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Aronson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · CSRC SIEGEL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · CSRC SIEGEL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-28 · MEMPK HENRY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · CSRC SIEGEL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
62%
44W–27L · 53.1% of games
8.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 62% of games
7.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 62.8% of games
8.0mixed
65.1%
28W–15L · 53.3% of games
8.5mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 50.6% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King