← Search

Sara Breese

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 111W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sara Breese to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
Nancy Siegel / Diego Medina
2026-08-16 · CSRC MCCOLLETT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nathanael Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-08-09 · CSRC MCCOLLETT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Robers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · CSRC MCCOLLETT · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Robers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · MEMPK LOWERY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bardsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · CSRC MCCOLLETT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Robers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · MEMPK LOWERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bardsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · MEMPK LOWERY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bardsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · MEMPK LOWERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bardsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · MEMPK LOWERY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bardsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · MEMPK LOWERY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Rocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · MEMPK BREESE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Asiano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-13 · MEMPK LOWERY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bardsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 63% of games
4.0
50.6%
40W–39L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.5mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
54.9%
28W–23L · 51.7% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
39 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal