← Search

Tracy Marks

— year-end
97 matches · 34W–63L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Tracy Marks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-05-19 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-5
W
2026-05-12 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bhaskar Sosale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-29 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Plamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-28 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lewis Farinholt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · 1 MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Noelle Crews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · 1 MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Shaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
65%
13W–7L · 54.4% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40.7%
11W–16L · 45.4% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
2W–16L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams