← Search

Jennifer Shaffer

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 37W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Shaffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-08-06 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-23 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kratzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · MTC Cousineau · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · MTC Downing 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Nothnagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · MTC Cousineau · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · MTC Cousineau · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · Woodlake - Glen/Fath · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kratzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · Woodlake - Glen/Fath · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Shick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-22 · MTC Cousineau · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 66% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.3% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.6% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.1% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29.4% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer