← Search

Linda Zentner

Ammon, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
333 matches · 148W–185L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Zentner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history333 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Wheeler · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karri Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Gyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-28 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Wheeler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Belnap · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Wonder Women · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · Hulse · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-08 · Wonder Women · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 50.2% of games
3.5
54.4%
49W–41L · 52.2% of games
4.0
16.9%
10W–49L · 38.2% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.9% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
53.4%
31W–27L · 51% of games
7.5mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
91 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
76 matches
#1 Singles
19%
63 matches
#2 Singles
2%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe