← Search

Holly Gyles

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 93W–112L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Holly Gyles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Hulse's Heroes · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charles Stuart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · Hulse's Heroes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Hulse's Heroes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-19 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Charles Stuart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Eric Anderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-10 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Zentner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
59.6%
34W–23L · 54.1% of games
4.0
5%
1W–19L · 31.7% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
6.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 48.9% of games
6.5mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
31%
13W–29L · 44.8% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert