← Search

Ganga Perumparambil

Overland Park, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 63W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ganga Perumparambil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Bennett, Connie · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Castaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Bennett, Connie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Schmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · Bennett, Connie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · Bennett, Connie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Castaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-23 · Bennett, Connie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Paula Flattery-Aaron / Lisa Thompson
2026-03-09 · Bennett, Connie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · Bennett, Connie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Ifft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-02 · Bennett, Connie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · Bennett, Connie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Schmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-23 · Bennett, Connie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Schmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · Bennett, Connie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Schmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · Bennett, Connie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.9%
39W–24L · 52.8% of games
4.0
35%
14W–26L · 44.5% of games
7.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#1 Singles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer