← Search

Suzanne Shapland

— year-end
154 matches · 61W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Shapland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Geick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yunxia Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Norberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Shapland, Suzanne · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-02-27 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Boushka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Suzanne, Shapland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-06 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · Shapland, Suzanne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Geick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-30 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Norberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-01-25 · Shapland, Suzanne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-01-18 · Shapland, Suzanne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-12 · Suzanne, Shapland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Flattery-Aaron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams59 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 52.4% of games
4.0
25%
24W–72L · 39.1% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 55.3% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer