← Search

Cynthia Ottemann

CHAMPAIGN, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 133W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Ottemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
W
Susan Davis / Janice Zagardo
2026-08-21 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Kimpling-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marla Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Stacy Gibson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Crist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Laura Adams / Darla Bruder-Goodlick
2026-07-17 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Kaye/Sonnichsen-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Butterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Sue Chelikas / Deborah Schnepf
2026-07-10 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Kimpling-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Soonok Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Watson/Ottemann · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Butterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Caroline Cox
2026-06-25 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
59.3%
64W–44L · 52.9% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
53.7%
22W–19L · 54.1% of games
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 59.6% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
42 matches
#1 Singles
14%
35 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer