← Search

Jill Reynen

Champaign, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 69W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Reynen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-07-23 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Lindsay/Kopp-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Pucilowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Allison Bergh
2026-07-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-26 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Lindsay/Kopp-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karolyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-21 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Lindsay/Kopp-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie la Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Seiler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Lindsay/Kopp-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Neitzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · 7.5W Winter Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Stacy Gibson / Angela Woods
2026-02-21 · 7.5W Winter Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Podeschi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · 7.5W Winter Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Felina Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · with Ignacio Arretche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50.7%
38W–37L · 48.9% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 51.6% of games
7.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.7% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert