← Search

Mary Harper

— year-end
74 matches · 46W–28L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Mary Harper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Odell/Rogerson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-05 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Homan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · GATA/40/COMBO/FUCHS/PETRUSKA/SLV · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Fuchs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · GATA/40/COMBO/FUCHS/PETRUSKA/SLV · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Weik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · Odell Rogerson Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · GATA/40/TRILEVEL/FUCHSPETRUSKA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chrissa Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · NTC Sprague 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lun Cai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · NTC Sprague 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · GATA/40/TRILEVEL/FUCHSPETRUSKA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · NTC Sprague 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lun Cai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · GATA/40/TRILEVEL/FUCHSPETRUSKA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-27 · NTC Sprague 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Praveena Venugopalan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 56% of games
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams