← Search

Spartacus Crawford

— year-end
32 matches · 13W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Spartacus Crawford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Curran/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryce Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-15 · Curran/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Evan Curran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-03 · Curran/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Evan Curran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Curran/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Curran/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Malchow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · Curran/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-10 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Fong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Malchow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Fong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-16 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Malchow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · Crawford/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 68.8% of games
4.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 42.3% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe