← Search

Michael McKeown

— year-end
102 matches · 57W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michael McKeown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Demouy/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robby Hare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · Demouy/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Demouy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · Demouy/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Demouy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-25 · Demouy/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Bayham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · Schafer/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Schafer/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Schafer/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · McKeown/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Craig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · Schafer/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Sargent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Gordon Williams / Edmund Sauer
2026-05-02 · McKeown/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Igor Shalkevich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Sargent/McKeown/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams66 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
88.5%
23W–3L · 68.6% of games
4.5
28.9%
11W–27L · 42.7% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 54.2% of games
8.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.3% of games
4.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 69.7% of games
4.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
19%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams