← Search

Patricia Cunningham

— year-end
206 matches · 112W–94L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Patricia Cunningham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
L
2026-03-04 · LWR Steffens · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Reagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-02 · LWR Varsity Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · LWR Varsity Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Rhonda Sutton / Karen Davis
2026-02-20 · LWR Varsity Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Teresa Knight / Tressa Ridge
2026-02-18 · LWR Steffens · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Reagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-11 · LWR Steffens · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-09 · LWR Varsity Girls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-02 · LWR Varsity Girls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-26 · LWR Varsity Girls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ceccacci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-19 · LWR Varsity Girls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-12 · LWR Varsity Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-07 · LWR Steffens · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Reagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.3%
32W–22L · 53% of games
7.0
50%
55W–55L · 51.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
52 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer