← Search

Rita Battaglia

— year-end
127 matches · 54W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rita Battaglia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-03-16 · LWN Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Avallone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-09 · LWN Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Avallone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-02 · LWN Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammy Hallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-23 · LWN Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeri Fitchette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-16 · LWN Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammy Hallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-19 · LWN Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeri Fitchette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-12 · LWN Racketeers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Males
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-05 · LWN Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeri Fitchette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-03 · Payne Park Lacroix 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Avallone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-27 · Payne Park Lacroix 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Henn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-10-06 · Payne Park Lacroix 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammy Hallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-03-26 · LWN Arrington · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeri Fitchette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.8% of games
3.5
47.1%
24W–27L · 49.3% of games
6.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.3% of games
7.0
42%
21W–29L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#3 Female Doubles
5%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer