← Search

Alexander Boardman

Waynesville, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 148W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alexander Boardman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-08-12 · QRRC-Dadaian · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with William Haney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · KTC-Christman · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gopal Bhat
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-27 · QRRC-Crespo · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mari Ishida mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
John Bailey / Michael Stankas
2026-06-14 · QRRC-Dadaian · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawn Mcneil
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Michael Hall / Jenna Hagood
2026-06-05 · QRRC-Crespo · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mari Ishida mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · QRRC-Wynkoop · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · QRRC-Wynkoop · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Shope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · QRRC-Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-03 · QRRC-Wynkoop · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aaron Wolters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-29 · QRRC-Aguilera · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reid Wynkoop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-27 · QRRC-Wynkoop · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · QRRC-Merkle · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Lutz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
78.7%
59W–16L · 57.9% of games
5.0
56%
14W–11L · 53.7% of games
7.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.1% of games
8.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.2% of games
10.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#1 Singles
15%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams