← Search

Grayson Garmaker

Tulsa, OK
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 48W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Grayson Garmaker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Williford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Samantha Schoenhofer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elissandra Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-18 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chelsey Wolever mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-22 · declined/Sanders 4.5M/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Drew Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-13 · Howard/LF · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Linn Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
David Oraee / Conner Wood
2025-06-16 · declined/Sanders 4.5/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Drew Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-15 · OK/Lusnak/MIXED18&over8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Livingston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-13 · Howard/LF · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elissandra Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
80%
8W–2L · 60.7% of games
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
60.7%
17W–11L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer