← Search

Bill Walton

Canton, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 141W–73L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Bill Walton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Bridgemill - Gray · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Argano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · Bridgemill - Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-21 · Bridgemill - Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zach Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · Bridgemill - Gray · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ray Byerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · Bridgemill - Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Johanos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-23 · Bridgemill - Bill Walton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Neary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-22 · Bridgemill - Bill Walton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Neary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · Bridgemill - Bill Walton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Coons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-25 · Bridgemill - Bill Walton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stefan Tonners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-21 · USTA Atlanta/Matt Burnham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thad Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-03-15 · USTA Atlanta/Matt Burnham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Burnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · USTA Atlanta/Matt Burnham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edis Krnjic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
70%
21W–9L · 59.3% of games
4.0
36.8%
21W–36L · 46.6% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer