← Search

Claire Davis

— year-end
19 matches · 18W–1L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Claire Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Burkwood - Owens Combo 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Casey Carnohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · Burkwood Butterworth · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Carnohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · Burkwood Butterworth · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Burkwood - Owens Combo 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pamla Dietz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · Burkwood - Owens Combo 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pamla Dietz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · Burkwood Butterworth · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sunjana Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Burkwood - Owens Combo 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pamla Dietz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Burkwood Butterworth · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sunjana Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · Burkwood Decker · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4
W
2026-05-16 · Burkwood Decker · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Burkwood Decker · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Burkwood Decker · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.1% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
9.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 71.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer