← Search

Michelle Wycinsky

Glen Allen, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 120W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Wycinsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history194 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karolyn Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-16 · Belmont Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Lauren Palmer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Hermitage Shriner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Niell Jacobsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Belmont Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margie Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · Belmont - Berens 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · Belmont - Berens 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · Hermitage Shriner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with YOUNG CHOE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · Hermitage Shriner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Niell Jacobsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
Allison Masinter / April Weaver
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · with Abbey Orski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 66.6% of games
4.5
46.6%
27W–31L · 51.3% of games
8.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 59.9% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.3% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
86.8%
33W–5L · 62% of games
8.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams