← Search

Tami Jost

— year-end
88 matches · 50W–38L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tami Jost to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-09-06 · HTC HOWARD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rusty Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-30 · HTC HOWARD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Jost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Team 13 Jana Labra 7.5W · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Doise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · Team 13 Jana Labra 7.5W · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with April Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · HTC HOWARD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Jost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · HTC HOWARD · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Hawkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth van Houten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Halie Overton / Laura Walker
2026-06-18 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Ritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Duron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams85 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60.4%
29W–19L · 55% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.4% of games
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 63.7% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer