← Search

Ruth van Houten

— year-end
29 matches · 9W–20L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ruth van Houten to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Jost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Sherwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-07 · Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
L
2025-09-28 · Rockwall GAC/Lafferty W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Sonnen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-19 · Gleneagles/Wright-Shukis W4.0F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-09-14 · Rockwall GAC/Lafferty W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Gonzales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-12 · Gleneagles/Wright-Shukis W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan McMahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-06-19 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Lofgren W4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-29 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Lofgren W4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-08 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Lofgren W4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eleonor Belanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.7% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
12 matches
#1 Singles
31%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer