← Search

Debra Decker

EVANSVILLE, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 146W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Decker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history282 matches
W
Pamela Marshall / Jaimie Humbert
2026-09-03 · KY/HEN/CONRAD, Dawn · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Harpenau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Ingalls
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
Monica Warren / Jean Carver
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Ingalls
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
Jaimie Humbert / Laurie Austin
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
Stephanie Clark / Nicole Newland
2026-07-09 · Markwell · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Stephanie Clark / Katherine Jones
2026-07-07 · Markwell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Markwell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Cutshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Brandy Harpenau / Jaimie Humbert
2026-06-18 · Markwell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Markwell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kam Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Markwell · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · Markwell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ploetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 48.9% of games
3.5
70.2%
80W–34L · 58.1% of games
4.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.5% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 60.7% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 45.4% of games
7.5
55%
11W–9L · 53.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
59 matches
#1 Singles
7%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova