← Search

Stacy Lambert

— year-end
111 matches · 74W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Stacy Lambert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-09-03 · KY/HEN/CONRAD, Dawn · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Quehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · KY/HEN/MELANIE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Lindsey Finke / Katherine Jones
2026-07-14 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MAKO HOSOKAWA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · Markwell · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · Conrad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Haley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · Conrad · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Quehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Markwell · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Rachel Beier / Daria Sevastianova
2026-06-09 · Conrad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Quehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.6%
45W–13L · 56.6% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.7% of games
6.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.2% of games
7.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#5 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal