← Search

Andy Bressler

Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 82W–69L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andy Bressler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
W
2026-04-27 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawn Drury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-4
L
2026-04-26 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Bjorn's Borgs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Krudys mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Gelfond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-14 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Isaac Bamman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4
W
2026-01-11 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Cahoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-01-04 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Gelfond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5
W
2025-09-13 · Chip N Charge · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-1
L
2025-09-07 · Chip N Charge · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-4
L
2025-09-07 · Chip N Charge · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2025-08-26 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Cahoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 58.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 48.3% of games
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.2% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 57% of games
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.5% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.7%
29W–26L · 52.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova