← Search

Jacinda Johnson

Oxon Hill, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 94W–71L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jacinda Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-08-30 · High Noon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Gwynn-Sackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-2
W
2026-08-16 · High Noon Ballers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keenan Keeling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · High Noon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Wachter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-2
L
2026-07-25 · High Noon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim McNamara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-3
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Brizan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Brizan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Surmiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Browdie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loan Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Surmiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Surmiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Brizan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
60%
18W–12L · 57.4% of games
3.5
48.4%
31W–33L · 49.7% of games
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.5% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 55.9% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#1 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer