← Search

Kathryn Pisaro

Granada Hills, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 76W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Pisaro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-08-15 · The Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Kelley Bannon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Tracy Bodis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · The Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barb Jepson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · The Net Ninjas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Bannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Rancho Chicks · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gizelda Parr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · V- LLW Royal Court Jesters-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juliette Ormberget
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · Rancho Chicks · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marilyn Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Juliette Ormberget championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Juliette Ormberget championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · V- LLW Royal Court Jesters-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Spraggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50.4%
58W–57L · 50.4% of games
3.5
15.8%
3W–16L · 35.1% of games
6.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 54% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe