← Search

Gena Conron

Ellicott City, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 86W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gena Conron to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Thomasson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Ravekes · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelvin Commey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Ravekes · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Trochimowicz - This is 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammi Molavi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-6
L
2026-07-08 · Trochimowicz - This is 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Culbreath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Ravekes · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Ravekes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Muheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · Trochimowicz - This is 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · Oaksmith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Oaksmith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · Oaksmith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Segrist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
44.1%
63W–80L · 48.8% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.6% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 51.9% of games
7.5
45%
9W–11L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
45 matches
#1 Singles
20%
41 matches
#2 Singles
9%
19 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe