← Search

Adam Thomasson

Severna Park, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
280 matches · 152W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Thomasson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history280 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin McVeigh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · Erdely 2026 4.0 Singles · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gena Conron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-29 · Chaney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fabiola Custodio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Chaney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fabiola Custodio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · Chaney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with JD Zachry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Key Sar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Tacka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Tacka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Fretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 60.8% of games
3.5
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.1% of games
4.0
55.9%
57W–45L · 53.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 33.8% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.8% of games
7.5
60%
12W–8L · 51.6% of games
4.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 46% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 54.1% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
49 matches
#1 Singles
15%
41 matches
#2 Singles
8%
21 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer