← Search

Melissa Foy

— year-end
136 matches · 53W–83L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Melissa Foy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Williamson-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramon Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-19 · Williamson-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roy Cronise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · Williamson-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Valente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · Williamson-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramon Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · CORTA/Melissa Foy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri Medders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Juestel/Kirkland-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Kirkland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · CORTA/Melissa Foy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri Medders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Tiffany Davis / Leco Hutson
2026-04-09 · Juestel/Ha-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-08 · CORTA/Melissa Foy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Vickery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Jamie Williams / Bonnie Mann
2026-04-07 · Juestel/Ha-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haesook Joo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Noonan/Burbelo-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · CORTA/Melissa Foy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Lyn Noonan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams95 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.4% of games
3.5
72.7%
16W–6L · 65.3% of games
4.0
31%
31W–69L · 44.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe