← Search

Rebecca Tessitore

— year-end
117 matches · 67W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Tessitore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Denise Sousa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Allison Umbricht championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Francesca Loricco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-07-07 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Francesca Loricco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-26 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Jhanji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-02 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Seidl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-27 · COLLIER/ Glen Eagle / Matje · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kirsten Forbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · COLLIER/ Glen Eagle / Matje · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kirsten Forbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-09 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Seidl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-02-06 · COLLIER/ Glen Eagle / Matje · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kirsten Forbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-02 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Seidl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-26 · Grey Oaks / Werchek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Seidl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.1% of games
4.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.8% of games
4.5
52.1%
37W–34L · 50.8% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams