← Search

Allison Umbricht

Fairfield, CT
4.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
149 matches · 85W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Allison Umbricht to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Tessitore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimelle McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Armonk Domes Ryesing Stars 40+ 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-18 · Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Armonk Domes Ryesing Stars 40+ 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · Armonk Domes Ryesing Stars 40+ 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-04 · Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5W · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Signe Breeden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · Armonk Domes Ryesing Stars 40+ 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
85.9%
61W–10L · 63.8% of games
4.5
28.1%
18W–46L · 40.8% of games
9.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 61% of the time
#1 Singles
61%
91 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert