← Search

Meg Brown

— year-end
51 matches · 34W–17L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Meg Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-09-08 · PRC - Wilson - Fall 3.5 Tues · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tonja Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · PRC - Bertovic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bethany Bertovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · PRC - Bertovic · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Hardaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-28 · PRC - Bertovic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Rehovsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Rehovsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-12 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Rehovsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · PRC - Wilson Winter (TH) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-12 · PRC - Wilson Winter (TH) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Segrest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-29 · PRC - Wilson Winter (TH) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Segrest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-08 · PRC - Wilson Winter (TH) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gray Gambrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 54.1% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert