← Search

Benjamin Thompson

Williamsburg, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 44W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Benjamin Thompson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-06-13 · BAY:Amherst Aces:Hirsh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hirsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-5
W
Hans Doup / Robert Campbell
2026-04-18 · BAY:Amherst Aces:Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Ferriter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · HRH:Amherst Gents: Roche · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Getler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
Michael Freedman / Daniel Torres
2026-02-22 · HRH:Amherst Gents: Roche · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Ferriter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-15 · ETC:Mass Invasion:Schaffer/Lewis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · ETC:Mass Invasion 40UP:Schaffer/ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashley Schaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-09 · ETC:Mass Invasion 40UP:Schaffer/ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-10-05 · ETC:Mass Invasion 40UP:Schaffer/ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Kochis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-08-14 · BAY: Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Kochis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-29 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Ferriter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-07-26 · BAY: Hirsh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Pancione mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-07-12 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Ferriter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 42.7% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams