← Search

Andrew Coleman

Simsbury, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 37W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Coleman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-05-23 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Polhamus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 3-3
L
2026-03-22 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Burwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-15 · FV:De Baeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christie Kania mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Burwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · FV:De Baeck/ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cari Anne Goodwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · FV:De Baeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · FV:De Baeck/ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cari Anne Goodwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
W
2025-12-07 · FV:De Baeck/ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cari Anne Goodwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-12-06 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Burwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 6-7
L
2025-11-22 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bing Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
27.3%
27W–72L · 43.6% of games
4.5
4.8%
1W–20L · 27.8% of games
8.0mixed
32.1%
9W–19L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer