← Search

Bryan Craig

Atlanta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 10W–32L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Bryan Craig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Heeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Heeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-28 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Heeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-13 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-15 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-08-09 · Team Kester (CONFIRMED) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hector Vera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
2025-08-09 · Team Kester (CONFIRMED) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hector Vera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
2025-07-13 · Dekalb TC (Bryan Craig)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Penna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-12 · Dekalb TC (Bryan Craig)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Penna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-29 · Dekalb TC (Bryan Craig)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Fincher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-22 · Dekalb TC (Bryan Craig)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Fincher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-15 · Dekalb TC (Bryan Craig)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Porterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
4.0
15.2%
5W–28L · 39.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova